![]() While I got both the price action and the general cause correct, it was a crackdown by the Chinese government – as opposed to US or European authorities – that seems to have catalyzed this most recent crypto winter. ![]() That’s certainly the egg of a future Doomberg piece – time will tell if it hatches. I freely admit this proves how new I am to the crypto world, but hey – I pride myself on being a fast-learning chicken! I’ve since discovered that good old SBF (as he is colloquially known by those in the know) was the second largest donor to Joe Biden’s presidential campaign. ![]() Second, I was surprised to learn that Sam Bankman-Fried was an actual person. I have a firm belief that powerful people get tipped off just ahead of big events, either directly or indirectly, and you’d do well in life if you searched for (and listened to) these signals. First, every instinctive bone in my body was screaming that regulatory action in the crypto space was imminent, driven mainly by my observation of the behavior of Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, and Jack Dorsey, CEO of both Square and Twitter, as well as comments by various US and European authorities. The motivation for the piece was twofold. When I wrote Crypto Carnage Coming? in mid-May, bitcoin was trading digital hands for about $50,000 each. Want to catch the original articles when they publish? Subscribe below! In this inaugural edition, I revisit four articles I published about the crypto market. My solution to this dilemma is the Chicken Nuggets series, in which I’ll occasionally group together several (hopefully) interesting follow-ups to previous Doomberg articles. Often, the things I want to say in follow-up to a particular piece don’t justify a full Doomberg article but they do deserve some abbreviated airtime nonetheless. You receive great feedback from readers, the world continues to evolve, events unfold, and predictions you’ve made either prove true or, as I prefer to describe the alternative, too early. Interesting things happen after you write a Substack article. You know I’ve been sitting on that quote from the beginning, right? The chicken is involved the pig is committed. It was good enough to push them halfway to their first NBA Finals appearance in franchise history.“ The difference between involvement and commitment is like ham and eggs. ![]() Rui Hachimura (21 points on 8-of-10 shooting) and Austin Reaves (22 with 5-of-9 3-point shooting) were good, D’Angelo Russell (10 on 3-of-8) not so much.Įven LeBron James had some regrettable moments in a night where he was one rebound from a triple-double at 22 points, nine rebounds and 10 assists.īy the end of the game, both teams looked gassed, but the Nuggets had the player who couldn’t miss. It was an uneven game for the Lakers, who held a significant lead for much of the second and third quarters before the Nuggets took firm control in the fourth. Murray entered the fourth quarter with only 14 points, then threw down 23, coming one point short of outscoring the entire Lakers team. Meanwhile, Jokic had a monster night with 23 points, 17 rebounds, 12 assists and three steals. Murray’s 37 points led all scorers, and he also finished with 10 rebounds, five assists and four steals. Game Three is scheduled for Saturday at the Arena. The Nuggets guard looked like the version of himself that gained fame in the 2020 playoffs with a 37-point performance on Thursday, leading the Nuggets to a 108-103 win over the Los Angeles Lakers in Game Two of the Western Conference finals. The Denver Nuggets will head to Los Angeles with a 2-0 lead, and all it took was an appearance by Bubble Jamal Murray.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |